Water Ionization: Just a Fad?

Gone are the times when people simply drank water without worrying too much. Then came waterborne diseases, prompting water treatment procedures that later gave us pure water or the more popular distilled H2O. Then everyone wanted distilled bottled water until things changed. A few health experts argue that distilled H2O poses some health risk because of the absence of minerals. Then they came up with a water ionizer, an apparatus that adds healthful ions to ordinary water. The result is ionized water, which is said to be good to the health.

The Controversy

Proponents of ionized water seem to have exaggerated claims about the health benefits offered by water. Some medical researchers question the need for large doses of ions when the body can easily absorb the essential minerals through natural means. On the other hand, medical facilities across the globe continue to recommend ionized water, contending that it could help solve many common ailments, from childhood asthma to stomach cancer.

A weapons of mass influence

Proponents of ionized water have no dithering, round up their claims with compelling media content. A quick glance at the Google news feed produces volumes of related news articles and blogs. Many of these are concerned withbalanceand variousialsupporting ionized water. Within this market, there is a separate group of smaller, highly controversyous websites. The website involves live chat and arguments between readers over which water is the most hygienic, safest and most economical.

Ionized vs Deionized H2O

Proponents of ionized water seem to have confused two claims made by Deionized H2O. Deionized water is produced by a process known as distillation. In distillation, water is boiled and sealed with sand to maintain a temperature of approximately 100 degrees Fahrenheit. The process of neutralizing the molasses and removing the weed seeds is known as steaming. This method of producing deionized water has passed regulatory tests and is routinely used in Japan. However, it is monitored globally as well as in specific countries such as India, Turkey, and Israel. Nevertheless, many seek natural ionized water, insisting that it cleanses the body of toxins and foreign agents.

Proponents of natural ionized water seem to have exaggerated claims about the health benefits offered by water that contains charged particles. Even dosage levels, which can vary from source to source, are too low to provide meaningful information about its safety. Nevertheless, there is emerging evidence that may give cause for concern.

In addition to regular testing on a variety of materials, researchers may one day find out whether Ionized H2O poses any risk to the health of the brain. Brain tumors, Alzheimer’s disease, and induced strokes may be prevented if only patients with readily available high-sulfuric diets are given frequent tests to determine their suitability for preventing these deadly diseases. So far, there is no scientific evidence that high-sulfuric foods harm the brain but some studies have shown that they boost the size of the brain gland, so as to make the case that some degree of ionization may be beneficial to the human body in general. This remains an open issue.